Sunday, July 16, 2006

Why so down in the mouth?

Doonesbury by Gary Trudeau (date unknown, but it was a long,
long time ago- as indicated by their youthful campus appearances!)

As I was about to graduate from college many years ago, there appeared in the Sunday comics of our local paper one of my favorite Doonesbury strips. That's probably because it echoed my angst at the future. Standing on the edge of the abyss of job, career, family -- those things that comprise "real life" -- I, too, was about to leap, and things seemed dismal. Maybe that was partly because I'd majored in economics.

But the comics that particular Sunday morning showed a very young Mike Doonesbury and Zonker Harris just hangin' out on campus, as they so often did back in those days, when a preppie looking kid passed by looking especially glum.

Zonker couldn't let him pass without querying, "Hey! Who are you, and why are you looking so down in the mouth?" Turns out the kid, "Jim", was about to graduate and embark on his career two days later with a job at the First National Bank in New York.

Hearing this, Zonker apologizes to the kid saying, "Oh, gee, hey, look I'm sorry. I'm so embarrassed for asking...I..." to which Jim responds, "It's o.k. Really. Don't blame yourself...there's no way you could have known."

As the kid walks off, head hanging, Zonker is heard to say to Doonesbury, "I feel just awful."

"You didn't know, man, you didn't know," is Doonesbury's consoling reply.

It's one of only two Doonesbury strips I ever clipped and saved. Newsprint that's yellowed from 30+ years, it's still in remarkable condition otherwise.

Well, recently, I'd been reading of tremendous budget cuts being made here upon stateside army bases. Civilians are being laid off. Equipment in need of repair is going unrepaired unless it's being deployed to Iraq. From the sounds of it, the army is being made to "eat itself" at the cost of stateside preparedness of its ordnance.

But the cost of the war isn't being extracted solely from equipment being cannabalized and left unrepaired to maintain workable materiel for our army in Iraq. There's a tremendous burden being placed on our army's personnel as well. A great fatigue is setting in among our military. They, like their equipment, are being cannibalized out of a weariness from their overextension. And that's manifesting in an angst for a future of unending wars. This was revealed during an encounter that took place just a couple of days ago.

You see, this past Friday I got this strange sense of Doonesbury déjà vu as I listened to an experience my wife and a friend had during a downtown lunch hour peace vigil outside our local federal courthouse. As she told of it, I was reminded of this particular Doonesbury strip. Except her story wasn't as funny.

Picketing against the war as she and a small but extremely dedicated group do every Friday of every week, month, year until this crazy war insanity is ended, she noticed some hesitancy in an approaching passerby. Dressed in desert camouflage fatigues topped off with a black beret, this "Jim" was obviously a soldier.

Perhaps it was just curiosity, or maybe some compulsion to interact with this group of protestors that made him slow his pace as he was passing. Sensing this, my wife asked how he was doing. "Have you been to Iraq?" was another question lobbed at him.

As Jim paused to talk, his story unfolded. "Yes," he had been in Iraq. He had been among the initial wave of the military's shock and awe "liberators" in 2003. But that wasn't his only Iraq "tour" (you gotta love military vernacular!). He returned for a second. And each time he was injured in the line of duty while there. Although they didn't learn how or the extent of his injuries, they did learn that Jim, sadly, is on orders to redeploy to Iraq for a third time this October! (I became visibly livid at this news.)

My wife and a fellow demonstrator learned Jim was just coming from court. He is involved in a child custody case stemming from the dissolution of his marriage, rooted in his absences while in Iraq. There was a sadness about him and, as my wife described it, a vulnerability in his eyes.

Jim related that he and his fellow soldiers are being put into very bad situations in Iraq; of his sense there is no reason for us to be there; of his and the majority of his peer's disillusionment with the war and the total waste of it all.

He seemed interested in some of the alternatives given him by the group. Things like "A Guide to Military Discharges" as offered by the GI Rights Hotline and website. But I suspect, being a responsible parent concerned for his child, Jim will do the responsible thing, i.e., his duty as Uncle Sam expects, or I should say demands.

As he departed with information in hand provided him by the anti-war group, hugs were exchanged with the directive from the group to, "Take care of yourself." Both my wife and her friend were moved by their talk with Jim. To know there are many like him who are tired of this war. To have been able to offer alternative suggestions.

I imagined my wife turning to her fellow protestor afterwards and saying, "I feel just awful," to which her partner probably responded ala Mike Doonesbury, "You didn't know, man, you didn't know." But neither of them did.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

That's an interesting story Dada... I'm just wondering, though, why would it be considered the "responsible" thing for him to go on a third tour?

-- I'm thinking he must like doing it if he is going for the third time....

-- Also, if it is the responsible thing for him to do, why wouldn't it be the responsible thing for Jenna and not-Jenna to do too?

(Admittedly, I know nothing about how the U.S. army works...)

Dena

PTCruiser said...

A very sad story indeed.

Dada said...

Hi Dena: Good questions! First, let me say, this was one very disturbed troop from what my wife relates. He definitely does NOT want to return to this waste of a war.

I guess my calling his return to Iraq the "responsible thing to do" was a reference to this soldier's custody battle for his child he finds himself locked in against his former wife.

Married just before one of his "tours" to Iraq, his wife dumped the child on the soldier's mom. Since his return, she wants the child back. He is a man at war on several fronts. To desert his "duty" by refusing to return to Iraq would surely be the end of any chance to win this battle for his child.

(As I walked slowly away, singing to myself a few lines from "Hotel California"......
......"we are just prisoners here, of our own device"......
Be thankful I'm just singing to myself and you can't hear me!)

Anonymous said...

Speaking as someone who experienced the divorce of my parents I can only say I feel most sympathy for the kid - who sounds like a pawn in a power struggle.

Of course we can't know the details -- but it's a mystery to me why a sensible court would look upon an absent father as more worthy of custody than one present in the U.S.... (Although I do understand that a GOP-leaning court would want to "reward" a man for doing his "patriotic" duty... by giving him "custody" --I must say I find that very sad...

I guess the song is apt -- especially the "we can check out any time we like but we can never leave..." - which I interpret as we can't run away from, well, really anything... So in the case of this man -- if he doesn't want to be a soldier anymore he should do himself a big favor and find some other work.

Dena

Anonymous said...

P.S. I once sang Hotel California on a karoke night -- and it was very painful for all concerned -- mostly me and the guy singing it with me -- lucky no one was paying any attention... :-)

Anonymous said...

dada, "Stop Loss = Draft" [I know I sound like a broken record on this]. These soldiers are "under signed contract" ... they can't just walkaway or refuse to go when ordered on another "tour" without facing serious legal repercussions (unless their name is Bush). But I had to ask my husband for clarifiction on this difference between Vietnam & Iraq tours of duty: ONE tour in Vietnam was the norm. Further tours were voluntary. A not-too-obscure observation: After a second or third tour, many guys had become desocialized with much difficulty fitting back into daily non-military life. And this, I think, reveals another agenda behind the current strategy of 2nd, 3rd, 4th tours ... these now-no-longer-so-young men will simply become life-long soldiers with no other place they fit in than the military. I don't think we can look to the soldiers themselves to end this insanity, especially with the current rumsfeldian path toward indentured servitude ... we as a society need to change things here at home first, starting at the top. And at that point, I hope the soldiers will join with us, their brothers & sisters, their mothers & fathers. D.K.

Dada said...

DK: OMG! So, if I'm reading you right, you're calling for a military coup?
(grin)

Dada said...

Dena: Well, I would have liked to have been in the audience to hear your and your friend's rendition of "Hotel California".

As for the GI and his custody battle for his child. According to him, after deployment to Iraq, his wife dumped the kid on the GI's mom. Period.

So, I don't know...who does? It may be that neither the soldier or his wife were really ready to be parents. One could speculate to no end I suppose.

But....but.....re your comment, "'we can check out any time we like but we can never leave...' - which I interpret as we can't run away from, well, really anything" sounds right to me. Spending my first 21 years as a Californian, and having been gone from there more that I was there, in my mind I'm still staying at the Hotel California.

I suppose that's because there's no way in god's green hell I'd ever call myself a Texan. (Now if I lived just 7 miles up the road, I'd be more than proud to "check out of H.Calif." and call myself "New Mexican", but since I'm not, I can't, which tends to lend creedence to the Eagles original hypothesis, doesn't it?

Anonymous said...

no coup, dada, more like what happened in the old USSR, where the people themselves brought down the old regime and the military did NOT fire on their own countrymen. However, I also have bad thoughts about "meet the new boss, same as the old boss" ...

oooh, that line from Hotel Calif ... maybe too big a twilight zone fan, but I always thought it referred to your being able to die (check out), but your ghost would still stay around in that evil hotel (we are programmed to receive)! D.K.

Anonymous said...

Dada,
Thanks for your comments...

Why not call yourself a Texan? For Gods sake! has Bush approriated that too? It makes me think there are sane, humanitarian, thoughtful, gentle Texans out there... I know a Jungian analyst who lives in Austin, Texas -- my idea of the best kind of person...

And DK, what a scary but thoughtprovoking comment... The army sounds like the worst kind of abusive family -- first they suck you in -- then they twist your mind so badly that you can't do anything else or live in any other type of reality -- then they dump you on a street corner when they're done with you! Yech!

Dena