Sandra Day O'Connor is no longer a Supreme Court justice. Unfettered, she is now free to speak a little more openly on her take of the state of the nation. That's what she did yesterday. I was so excited to learn that two congress members from Texas were featured in her speech. What a CREDIT to the state. (NOT!)
"Supreme court justices keep many opinions private but Sandra Day O'Connor no longer faces that obligation. Yesterday, the retired justice criticized Republicans who criticize the courts.She said they challenge the independence of judges and the freedoms of all Americans."
As reported by Nina Totenberg of NPR News, Washington:
O'Connor's speech at G.U. was not available for broadcast but NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg was there......
In an unusally forceful and forthright speech, O'Connor said that attacks on the judiciary by some Republican leaders pose a direct threat to our Constitutional freedoms. O'Connor began by conceding that courts do have the power to make presidents or the congress or governors, as she put it, really, really angry. But, she continued, if we don't make them mad some of the time, we probably are doing our jobs as judges. And our effectiveness, she said, is premised on the notion that we won't be subject to retaliation for our judicial acts.
The nation's founders wrote repeatedly, she said, that without an independent judiciary to protect individual rights from the other branches of government, those rights and privileges would amount to nothing. But, said O'Connor, as the founding fathers knew, statutes and constitutions don't protect judicial independence, people do.
And then she took aim at former House GOP leader, Tom DeLay. She didn't name him, but she quoted his attacks on the courts at a meeting of the conservative Christian group, Justice Sunday, last year when DeLay took out after the courts for rulings on abortion, prayer, and the Terri Schiavo case. This, said O'Connor, was after the federal courts had applied Congress' one time only statute about Chiavo as it was written, not, said O'Connor, as the congressman might have wished it were written.
The response to this flagrant display of judicial restraint said O'Connor, her voice dripping with sarcasm, was that the congressman blasted the courts! It gets worse she said, noting that death threats against judges are increasing.
It doesn't help, she said, when a high profile senator suggests there may be a connection between violence against judges and decisions that the senator disagrees with. She didn't name him but it was Texas Senator John Cornyn who made that statement after a Georgia judge was murdered in the courtroom and the family of a federal judge in Ill. murdered in the judge's home.
O'Connor observed that there have been a lot of suggestions lately for so-called judicial reforms, recommendations for the massive impeachment of judges, stripping the courts of jurisdiction and cutting judicial budgets to punish offending judges. Any of these might be debatable, she said, as long as they are not retaliation for decisions that political leaders disagree with.
"I," said O'Connor, "am against judicial reforms driven by nakedly partisan reasoning." Pointing to the experience of developing countries and former communist countries where interference with an independent judiciary has allowed dictatorship to flourish. O'Connor said, we must be ever vigilant against those who would strong arm the judiciary into adopting their preferred policies. It takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls into dictatorship she said, but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings.