Thursday, January 19, 2006
Hold still, this'll only take a minute.
The beauty of the vise is it has two sides which, when squeezed together enable it to put sufficient pressure upon an object to screw it, unscrew it, file it, i.e., smooth its rough edges, or perform other manipulations upon it per the user's whim.
Funny, but I thought of this tool while watching this evening's news. Let me just give you two sample stories from the networks tonight.
The first was the story of Bin Laden's latest threat/offer to America. In it, terrorist numero uno said al Qaeda was prepping for attacks here in the US but the group was open to a conditional truce with Americans. I was watching this (unfortunately) on CBS. (I switched to another network immediately afterwards.)
While CBS devoted all of this story to the new threat of al Qaeda terrorist attacks here in America, it gave only one sentence to the 'conditional truce' offering from Bin Laden. And you know what was funny about his conditions for a truce? They are some of the same things being debated on the floors of the two houses of our U.S. Congress, i.e., withdrawal of American troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.
But what's even funnier is, the Bush administration discredited the truce portion of Bin Laden's message, while choosing to validate the threat portion, as my wife was so quick to point out. Are you fucking scared enough yet, Americans? If not, maybe Bush will raise the alert level, something til now--despite Bin Laden's ominous overtones--he's deemed unwarranted.
So in order to avoid losing my supper, I jumped on the TV remote to procure a new source for news. Forgive me if I don't remember where I landed, but it was NBC or ABC. Whatever. And the story I heard next was of Jill Carroll, the 28 year old abducted American Christian Science Monitor reporter whose captors deadline for her release/execution is rapidly approaching. A desperate plea for her safe return was being made by her mother.
I couldn't stop thinking about the American general after his adamant bravadoed reaffirmation, "America does not negotiate with terrorists."
"What if it was HIS daughter?" I thought. Or Cheney's? Or one of the Bush twins? Would our resolve be so strong?
And then we were told by the network that we're not even sure who the real kidnappers are. "Contract kidnappers" was the phrase the network used, leading me to ponder exactly who would want Jill Carroll removed. Surely there's the insanity of the terrorists. But what of the insanity of our own American terrorism? After all, how many independent journalists have accidentally died at the hands of the trigger happy American military?
Carroll is known as a "compassionate, scrupulous reporter who cares deeply for the Iraqi people," leaving in question who might want her removed enough to hire contract kidnappers?
It's my concern here we may accept too readily the line fed us by our media, a media that has failed us grossly and continues to do so daily. So before we jump into the mush we're being fed, take time to consider the vise being used to hold our brains in place as they're being screwed, unscrewed, or filed down. It requires pressure from more than one side to reshape your head.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
you are realy watching and paying attention, and you realize what you have done- you have Fallen Out of the Spin Cycle- Congratulations- now if we can just get more to do the same...Carroll is a great writer..and a smart journalist- she is smart- she looked tired on the video- but she is using every diplomatic bone in her body and all her smarts- she speaks the language- she studied the culture....I am rooting for her...and yes, Chilabi knows all about contract kidnappings....She had been covering political factions- after the election...there is more to this story...
keep blogging it - you're doing a good job...
Quote Dada> "the 'conditional truce' offering from Bin Laden. And you know what was funny about his conditions for a truce? They are some of the same things being debated on the floors of the two houses of our U.S. Congress"<
Here's where much of the US is at, judging by the popular right wing talk radio shouters: I was listening to Sean Hannity yesterday and he used the same example that you are using but to make the opposite point; to wit: the "libs" in congress, specifically Kennedy, Murtha, et. al. are in synch with Bin Laden and so if the American public is turning against the war it may be because the libs are doing the work of the terrorists. Wow, this begins to sound like the ominous refrain of wars past, such as "Who lost China?" Or the contemporary hyper-aggressiveness and bellicosity following the defeat by the "gooks" in BF Goodrich sandals (AKA, the Viet Cong). And lest we forget, one Mr. Adolf Hitler came to power following a similar scenario: the resentment of the German public toward politicians who "lost" WW I. Farfetched? Well, just look at today's news regarding our government's obtaining a week's worth of search/inquiry information from AOL, Yahoo and Microsoft. Hooray for Google but one begins to feel like a character out of Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451.
Eljoven
Doesn't it seem Bin Laden likes to make an appearance whenever Bush is taking heat & really needs a boost? Hmmm ... also, I wanted to pass along a comment my husband made this A.M. that this lying warmongering administration has driven him "sane" ! And right now, John Conyers is hosting a thoughtful conference on domestic surveillance on C-Span if anyone's interested. D.K.
Have you noticed that we haven't had a raised terroism alert since BEFORE the election.
Nona, you know we won't see an orange alert until Oct 2006. See headline article on Buzzflash today: If Osama didn't exist, Rove would have to invent him. D.K.
and you added directions for the Vise - nice touch...
so strange that Osama Offers up a Truce- oh, I am so scared..HA!!!
Actually I am more Scared of Bush and His Cronies...
Post a Comment